Democracy and Planetary Fragility in the Anthropocene: on William Connolly’s Political Ontology

  • Dmitry Lebedev
Keywords: Democracy, Anthropocene, negativity, micropolitics, conjuncture

Abstract

As climate change rapidly intensifies, political theory urgently needs to respond to the shock of the Anthropocene and bring nature back to politics. William Connolly’s work is a paradigmatic example of such a theory that actively emphasizes the role nonhuman forces play in the social and political world and the discontinuity this emphasis brings to political theory. Connolly underscores fragile resonances between nature and culture and productively problematizes a human-centric vision of politics. However, while interrogating how contemporary political conjuncture catastrophically increases planetary fragility, he still insists on the continuity of his vision for democratic pluralism that this very conjuncture fundamentally puts in question. Thus, Connolly’s type of post-anthropocentric ontology remains rather inconsistently connected to explicitly political concerns. This article aims to clarify this connection. On the one hand, it shows how his brand of democratic politics that answers to the challenges of the Anthropocene presupposes a heightened degree of political negativism and universalism that used to be excluded from this politics. On the other, it demonstrates how the discontinuities in ontology must be simultaneously thought of as the discontinuities in established political theorizing and to continuously interrogate the very conjuncture that reveals the relevance of these ontological and political discontinuities.

Author Biography

Dmitry Lebedev

PhD Candidate, “Stasis” Center for Practical Philosophy
European University at St Petersburg,
Gagarinskaya st., 7, St Petersburg, Russia
E-mail: dlebedev@eu.spb.ru

References

Althusser, Louis (1999). Machiavelli and Us. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London: Verso. Connolly, William E. (1985). “Taylor, Foucault, and Otherness.” Political Theory 13.3:
365–76.
Connolly, William E. (1993). “Voices from the Whirlwind.” In In the Nature of Things: Language, Politics, and the Environment, eds. Jane Bennett and William Chaloupka, 197–225. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William E. (1995). The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William E. (1999). “Assembling the Left.” Boundary 2 26.3: 47–54. Connolly, William E. (2002a). Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox [1991]. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William E. (2002b). Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William E. (2013). The Fragility of Things: Self-organizing Processes, Neo-liberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Connolly, William E. (2017a). Aspirational Fascism: The Struggle for Multifaceted Democracy under Trumpism. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William E. (2017b). Facing the Planetary: Entangled Humanism and the Politics of Swarming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Connolly, William E. (2019). Climate Machines, Fascist Drives, and Truth. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Coole, Diana (2000). Negativity and Politics: Dionysus and Dialectics from Kant to Poststructuralism. London: Routledge.
Deleuze, Gilles (1983). Nietzsche and Philosophy. Trans. Hugh Tomilson. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Dryzek, John S., and Johnathan Pickering. (2019). The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, William (1987). Writings 1902–1910. New York: Library of America.
Johnston, Adrian (2008). Žižek’s Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist Theory of Subjectivity. Evanston. IL: Northwestern University Press.
Johnston, Adrian (2014). Adventures in Transcendental Materialism: Dialogues with Contemporary Thinkers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Latour, Bruno (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. London: Polity.
Leys, Ruth (2011). “Critical Response II. Affect and Intention: A Reply to William E. Connolly.” Critical Inquiry 37: 799–805.
McNay, Lois (2014). The Misguided Search for the Political: Social Weightlessness in Radical Democratic Theory. London: Polity Press.
Mouffe, Chantal (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
Mouffe, Chantal (2020). “Why a Populist Left Should Rally around a Green Democratic Transformation.” OpenDemocracy https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/rethinking-populism/left-populist-strategy-post-covid-19.
Purdy, Jedediah (2015). After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tønder, Lars (2017). “Five Theses for Political Theory in the Anthropocene.” Theory & Event 20.1: 129–36.
Wenman, Mark (2008). “William E. Connolly: Pluralism without Transcendence.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10.2: 156–70.
Published
2021-07-29
How to Cite
Lebedev, D. (2021). Democracy and Planetary Fragility in the Anthropocene: on William Connolly’s Political Ontology. Stasis, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.33280/2310-3817-21-11-1-131-155
Section
Thematic Articles