The Contradiction between the American Women’s Movement and Psychoanalysis

  • Yana Markova ITMO
Keywords: sex, gender, psychoanalysis, American feminism, history of ideas

Abstract

The article examines the theoretical premises that shaped the history of tensions between psychoanalytic theory and the women’s rights movement. It argues that the roots of this conflict lie in a distinctly American way of conceptualizing sexual difference as consisting of two relatively independent layers: biological and social. The article traces the genealogy of this conceptualization of sexual difference, from sexology and sociology up to contemporary new materialism. The abstraction of sex and gender as separate entities, while sensible at certain points, creates—as the article demonstrates—conceptual difficulties that Judith Butler and their followers within the materialist turn have attempted to resolve. The article presents arguments from opponents of this conceptual distinction, drawing on phenomenology (e.g., Moira Gatens reading Maurice Merleau-Ponty) and existentialism (e.g., Toril Moi reading Simone de Beauvoir). It further contends that psychoanalysis offers an alternative way of thinking about sexual difference in its lived concreteness. However, the mismatch in foundational assumptions have prevented the American feminist movement from recognizing this aspect of psychoanalysis, leading to vehement critiques that—as the article shows—often miss their mark.

Author Biography

Yana Markova, ITMO

Lecturer,

ITMO, Kronverkskiy Prospekt, 49, lit. A.,

Saint Petersburg, Russia

E-mail: [email protected]

References

Alaimo, Stacy, Hekman, Susan J. (2008). Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Aleman, Horhe. (2019). Ob osvobozhdenii. Psihoanaliz i politika. M.: Gorizontal’.

Ashtor, Gila. (2021). Exigent Psychoanalysis: The Interventions of Jean Laplanche. Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Barad, Karen. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Batler, Dzhudit. (2002). Psihika vlasti: teorii sub»ekcii. Har’kov; SPb.: HCGI; Aletejya.

Batler, Dzhudit. (2022). Gendernoe bespokojstvo: feminizm i podryv identichnosti. M.: V–A–C Press.

Bovuar, Simona de. (1997). Vtoroj pol. T. 1 i 2. M.; SPb.: Progress; Aletejya.

Butler, Judith. (2011). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” Routledge Classics. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Butler, Judith. (2015). “Ideologies of the Super-Ego: Psychoanalysis and Feminism, Revisited,” in Juliet Mitchell and the lateral axis: twenty-first-century psychoanalysis and feminism, eds. R. Dushcinsky, S. Walker, 57–75. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Butler, Judith., Laclau, Ernesto, Žižek, Slavoj. (2000). Contingency, hegemony, universality: contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.

Carusi, Rana M. (2021). Lacan and critical feminism: subjectivity, sexuation, and discourse. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Copjec, J. (2012) “The Sexual Compact”. Angelaki 17 (2).

Copjec, Joan. (1994). Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ellis, Havelock, Symonds J. A. (1896). Das konträre Geschlechtsgefühl. Leipzig: G.H.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. (1993). “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female are not Enough.” The Sciences 33: 20–25.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne. (2020). Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. Second edition. New York: Basic Books.

Firestone, Shulamith. (1970). The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for a Feminist Revolution. New York: William and Morrow.

Frejd, Zigmund. (2003). «Tridcat’ tret’ya lekciya. ZHenstvennost’», v Soch., t. 1: Lekcii po vvedeniyu v psihoanaliz i novyj cikl. M.: OOO «Firma STD».

Frejd, Zigmund. (2006a). «Nekotorye psihicheskie posledstviya anatomicheskogo polov», v Soch., t. 5: Seksual’naya zhizn’. M.: OOO «Firma STD».

Frejd, Zigmund. (2006b). «Tri ocherka po teorii seksual’nosti» v Soch., t. 5: Seksual’naya ’. M.: OOO «Firma STD».

Frejd, Zigmund. (2006c). «Pechal’ i melanholiya», v Soch., t. 1: Psihologiya . M.: OOO «Firma STD».

Friedan, Betty. (1979). The Feminine Mystique. New Dell ed., 2nd print. New York: Dell.

Fuko, Mishel’ (2011). Bezopasnost’, territoriya, naselenie: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v de Frans v 1977-1978 uchebnom godu. SPb.: Nauka.

Fuko, Mishel’. (1996). «Volya k znaniyu. Istoriya seksual’nosti. Tom pervyj», v Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual’nosti, 98–268. M.: Kastal’.

Fuko, Mishel’. (2005). Nuzhno zashchishchat’ obshchestvo: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1975-1976 uchebnom godu. SPb.: Nauka.

Gaetano, Phil. (2017). “David Reimer and John Money Gender Reassignment Controversy: The John/Joan Case,” in Embryo Project Encyclopedia. URL: http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/13009

Garfinkel, Harold. (1984). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Gatens, Moira. (1996). “A Critique of the Sex/Gender Distinction,” in Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power, and Corporeality, 3–20. London; New York: Routledge.

Goffman, Erwing. (1988). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

Grosz, Elizabeth. (1989). Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Irigaray, Luce. (1985). Speculum of the Other Woman. New York: Cornell University Press.

Krafft-Ebing, Richard. (1998). Psychopathia Sexualis: With Especial Reference to the Antipathic Sexual Instinct: a Medico-forensic Study. New York: Arcade Publishing.

Lakan, ZHak. (1997). «Znachenie fallosa». V kn. Instanciya bukvy v bessoznatel’nom, ili sud’ba razuma posle Frejda, 137–47. M.: Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo.

Lakan, ZHak. (2011). Eshchyo. Seminary: Kniga XX (1972/73). M.: Gnozis, Logos.

Laplanche, Jean. (1989). New foundations for psychoanalysis. Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA: Basil Blackwell.

Laqueur, Thomas W. (1990). Making sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Millett, Kate. (2000). Sexual Politics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Millett, Kejt. (1994). «Teoriya seksual’noj politiki». Voprosy filosofii 9:147–72.

Mitchell Juliet. (1982). “Introduction — I,” in Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne, eds. J. Mitchell, J. Rose, 1–26. London: Macmillan.

Mitchell, Juliet. (2000). Psychoanalysis And Feminism: a Radical Reassessment Of Freudian Psychoanalysis. 2nd revised edition. New York: Basic Books.

Mitchell, Juliet. (2015). “Debating Sexual Difference, Politics, and the Unconscious: With Discussant Section by Jacqueline Rose,” in Juliet Mitchell and the lateral axis:

twenty-first-century psychoanalysis and feminism, eds. R. Dushcinsky, S. Walker, 77–99. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Moi, Toril. (1999). “What Is a Woman? Sex, Gender, and the Body in Feminist Theory,” in What Is a Woman? And Other Essays, 3–120. New York: Oxford University Press.

Moj, Toril. (2004). Seksual’naya tekstual’naya politika. M.: Progress-Tradiciya. Money, John, Hampson, Joan G., Hampson, John L. (1957). “Imprinting and the

Establishment of Gender Role,” in A.M.A. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 77(3): 333–336. New York: Cornell University Press.

Nussbaum, Marta. (2018). «Professor parodii». Sygma, March 28, 2018. https://syg.ma/@dmitry-sereda/marta-nussbaum-profiessor-parodii.

Parsons Talcott, Bales, Robert F. (2002). Family socialization and interaction process. Reprint. London: Routledge, 2002.

Repo, Jemima. (2015). The Biopolitics of Gender. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rose, Jaqueline. (1982). “Introduction — II” in Feminine sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne, eds. J. Mitchell, J. Rose, 27–58. London: Macmillan.

Rubin, Gejl. (2000). «Obmen zhenshchinami: zametki o ‘politicheskoj ekonomii’ pola». V kn. Hrestomatiya feministskih tekstov. Perevody, pod red. Eleny Zdravomyslovoj i

Anny Tyomkinoj, 89–139. SPb.: Izdatel’stvo «Dmitrij Bulanin».

Salecl, Renata. (2000). “Introduction,” in Sexuation, ed. Renata Salecl, 1–9. SIC 3. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Smulyanskij, A. (2021). «Pereobretenie pola: ot gendernyh issledovanij k teorii seksuacii». Stasis 12 (2): 122–59.

Stoller, Robert J. (1968). Sex and gender: On the Development of Masculinity and Femininity. London, London: Hogarth; Institute of Psycho-analysis.

Tupinamba, G. (2024). ZHelanie psihoanaliza: opyty lakanovskogo myshleniya. M.: RIPOL-Klassik.

Uest, Kendes, Zimmerman, Don. (2000). «Sozdanie gendera». V kn. Hrestomatiya feministskih tekstov. Perevody, pod red. Eleny Zdravomyslovoj i Anny Tyomkinoj, 193–219. SPb.: Izdatel’stvo «Dmitrij Bulanin».

Published
2025-06-17
How to Cite
Markova, Y. (2025). The Contradiction between the American Women’s Movement and Psychoanalysis. tasis, 12(2). etrieved from http://www.stasisjournal.net/index.php/journal/article/view/278